But what is a material fact? Generally, a fact is material if it tends
In my upcoming text with Adam Lamparello, we use the example of a
professional-baseball-player client. If you’re drafting a motion to
suppress drugs found on the client during a traffic stop, the client’s 95-mph
fastball and two World Series rings likely aren’t material. But if you represent the same client in a medical
malpractice case where a doctor’s negligence damaged the client’s elbow
ligaments and cost him his baseball career, the client’s 95-mph fastball and Word
Series Rings are material because they speak to the extent of the client’s
damages.
This
look-for-the-elements strategy for identifying material facts will work no
matter the type of case you’re handling. Assume you are representing a party
claiming breach of contract. The defense is that the parties had no binding contract. Any
facts that tend to prove or disprove the existence of an offer, acceptance of
that offer, a meeting of the minds, and consideration are material. Writings
between the parties that you contend constitute offer and acceptance—material.
The content of a telephone conversation between the parties that you contend
shows a meeting of the minds—material. The length of time the plaintiff and
defendant have been in business—probably not material. The parties’ expertise
in their respective businesses—also not likely material.
When briefing a case or
writing a brief, you may need to provide non-material facts to give background
and enable the reader (whether it’s you later, your boss, opposing counsel, or
a judge) to understand the context in which the case arose. But the only facts
that matter are the material ones, so you need to focus your attention on
understanding how they impact the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.