Photo courtesy of eBay seller betweenthehedges1980 |
The Eleventh Circuit described the beer maker’s hope that the beer would “pile up yardage and score big points” in the beer market, “kick[ed] off” its discussion by noting it would only be deciding whether the district court properly applied the Lanham Act, and concluded that while the beer maker had a clever “entrepreneurial game plan,” the University of Georgia was able to hold it to “little or no gain."
This case and others are part of my article Riding the Bench--A Look at Sports Metaphors in Judicial Opinions which is forthcoming this fall in the Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law.
Happy Football Season!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.