A motion for reconsideration isn’t the place to make new
arguments—the judge almost certainly won’t consider them. The most effective
motions for reconsideration are those that target the judge’s (1)
misunderstanding of the facts; (2) misapplication of the law; or (3) failure to
address certain issues.
The Facts. If the
judge’s ruling is based on a misunderstanding of the facts, use the motion to
explain the true facts and support that explanation with affidavits,
deposition testimony, documents etc. Attach copies of the relevant transcripts
or documents, if permissible, or include the exact testimony—rather than
characterizations—in the motion itself. (See my prior post here on the
effectiveness of this technique)
Similarly, if the judge has granted a motion for summary
judgment when a factual dispute exists, show the judge the evidence of the
dispute—the conflicting deposition testimony or documents, for example. Attach
them if you can. Otherwise, refer to them in a way that will enable to the
judge to easily locate them in the file or record.
The Law. If you
believe the judge misapplied the law, tell the judge how by offering language
from the cases, statutes, etc. themselves and the judge’s order to show the
disconnect. Be specific. For example:
In its order, the
Court expressed sympathy for Plaintiff but held it had no choice but to dismiss
the complaint, citing Section 54.3(b) of the statute. But Section 54.3(b) uses
the term “may,” not “must.” Thus, the Court incorrectly held it was required to
dismiss the complaint when, in actuality, it was not.
Unaddressed Issues. If
the judge failed to address certain arguments, show the court that you made
those arguments by referring to any prior briefs or argument in the case. For
example, assume a court granted a motion for summary judgment on the ground
that the plaintiff could not state a claim for breach of contract but failed to
address arguments that the plaintiff could recover under another theory
(promissory estoppel or unjust enrichment). Your motion for reconsideration might
include something like this:
The court found
Plaintiff cannot recover for breach of contract and dismissed the complaint.
But the Court failed to address Plaintiff’s other theories of recovery:
promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment. Plaintiff’s complaint includes
counts for promissory estoppel (Count 2) and unjust enrichment (Count 3).
Further, in response to Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff also argued that it could
proceed under those theories even if its breach of contract claim were
dismissed. See Plaintiff’s Response
to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pp. 6-9. In dismissing the complaint, the
court failed to consider or address Plaintiff’s alternative theories of
recovery.
No matter the basis of your request, keep it as short as
possible while saying what you need to say. As a Twitter friend reminded me
recently, never forget BITSOW: Brevity is the soul of wit.
(Shakespeare—Hamlet). You won’t score any points with the judge by filing a
lengthy, tedious request for reconsideration. Make the points you need to make,
then stop!
Finally, never attack the judge. You shouldn’t feel timid is
saying the judge “erred” or “misapplied the law” or “failed to address” an
issue. Judges are humans—they make mistakes and most want to correct those
mistakes. But calling the judge “uninformed” or “uneducated” won’t win you any points.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.