I’m not going to pretend that The
Bluebook is not confusing—because it is.
And for every general rule I think I’ve learned, I always seem to later find
an exception I didn’t know about. Below are
three “tricky” Bluebook rules:
1. Case names—Case names are abbreviated pursuant to the
abbreviations listed in Table 6 only in citation sentences. If the case name is contained in the text of the
sentence, the name is not abbreviated except for “widely known acronyms” and
the words “&” “Ass’n,” “Bros.,” “Co.,” “Corp.,” “Inc.,” “Ltd.,” and “No.” Bluepages
Rule B4.1.1(vi). For example:
“[E]ven subject-matter jurisdiction may not
be attacked collaterally.” Travelers Indem. Co. v. Bailey, 557 U.S.
137, 152 (2009) (quoting Kontrick v. Ryan,
540 U.S. 443, 455 n.9 (2004)).
The Supreme Court’s holding in Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey, 557
U.S. 137 (2009), is narrow.
2. Citations to Westlaw/Lexis—I often see errors with these citations. The failure to include the docket number and
the full date of the opinion are the most common errors in citations to
unreported cases available on Westlaw or LexisNexis.
Westlaw
and LexisNexis cases are cited like other cases with the full case name, docket
number, database, court name, and full opinion date. Bluebook Rule 10.8.1
For example:
The opinion is Wreyford v. Citizens for Transportation Mobility, Inc., No. 1:12-CV-2524-RLV,
2013 WL 3965244 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 1, 2013).
Pinpoint cites for unreported cases are slightly
different than those for cited cases. For
unreported cases, you should put a comma after the database information then
the word “at” and an asterisk before the page number.
The court held that “[e]ven if
commercial calls are more burdensome on average than non-commercial calls,
under intermediate scrutiny, Congress is not required to use the least
restrictive means of promoting the government interest….” Wreyford
v. Citizens for Trans. Mobility, Inc.,
No. 1:12-CV-2524-RLV, 2013 WL 3965244, at *3 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 1, 2013).
3. Numbers and superscript—“Second” is abbreviated “2d” and “third”
is abbreviated “3d” (not 2nd or 3rd), and no superscripts should be used (e.g. 11th). So,
Courts consider more
than just the defendant’s proximity to a firearm in determining if the defendant
was in “possession” of the weapon. United
States v. Benjamin, 711 F.3d 371 (3d Cir. 2013).*
Appellate courts review a district court’s grant of summary
judgment de novo, viewing all
evidence and making all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to
the non-moving party. Hulsey v. Pride
Rests., LLC, 367 F.3d 1238, 1243 (11th Cir. 2004).
*“United
States” is not abbreviated when it is a party to an action. Bluepages
B4.1.1(v).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.