I call writers who draft
paragraphs “stuffed with dates” disinterested historians. These disinterested
historians begin or end sentence after sentence with “on X date . . . .”
Using time markers rather
than specific dates makes a paragraph flow. Words and phrases such as
·
Then
·
Nearly two
years later
·
After Smith
and Jones signed the contract
·
Within a month
add context when the
specific dates aren’t necessary for resolution of the issue and make the
statement of facts flow more like a story.
A good example comes from brief in support of a TRO filed by Neal Katyal in litigation over President Trump’s second
executive order banning people from certain countries from entering the United
States. Though he includes some key dates as well, Katyal employs this
technique in outlining the events leading up to the travel ban:
Later, as the presumptive Republican nominee, Mr. Trump began using facially neutral language to describe the Muslim ban. . . .
Throughout the campaign, Mr. Trump also made clear that his plans extended to disfavoring Muslim refugees while favoring their Christian counterparts.
After his election, the President-Elect signaled that he would not retreat from his Muslim ban.
Sometimes dates are critical.
When they are, of course the writer should include them. But when they aren’t, writers
can employ this excellent technique to tell the client’s story in a more
interesting and readable way.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.