The ABA Blawg 100 is taking nominations for its list of 100 top law-related blogs. If you like this blog, please consider nominating it. The short form is available at http://www.abajournal.com/blawgs/blawg100_submit/
Nominations will be taken through August 9, 2013.
Thanks again to all those who regularly read my posts. I hope you enjoy them. As always, if you have a topic you'd like covered, please let me know.
Monday, July 29, 2013
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
A Capital Affair
Even the
savviest writers often have trouble figuring out when to capitalize certain
types of words.
Seasons—Names
of the seasons: fall, winter, spring, and summer should only be capitalized
when they are part of a proper name. For
example,
Summer Olympics
Fall Semester
Otherwise,
season names are not capitalized:
I’ll start studying for the bar exam in the summer.
The
Internet—This one is a bit tricky, but according to the Chicago Manual of
Style, the term “Internet” is capitalized because it refers to one large
network; however, the term “website” is generic and, therefore, is not capitalized.
Earth—When
the term “earth” is used to refer to the land itself (i.e. the ground), it is
not capitalized. When the term “Earth”
is used to refer to the planet, it should be capitalized.
He dug in the earth for buried treasure.
Views
of Earth from space are amazing.
Mother
et al.—Terms like “mother,” “father,” “sister,” and others should be
capitalized only when used in place of a person’s name. If the term follows a possessive pronoun like
“my” or “your,” the term is not capitalized.
The defendant’s mother alerted police to her son’s whereabouts.
I will await Mother’s call about Susan’s
bar exam results.
Federal/state—terms
like “federal” and “state” are capitalized when used as part of an official
organization name.* For example,
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is
hiring.
Many non-citizens do not understand how the
federal government operates.
Businesses must be careful to comply with
all federal and state laws.
The state will be furloughing workers,
including judges.
Directions—Directions
(e.g. north, south) should be capitalized only when referring to specific
regions. For example,
The defendant was raised in the South.
To get to the courthouse, drive south on
First Street and turn left at the third light.
Job
Titles—Titles should be capitalized when used before a person’s name, but not
when used in place of a person’s name.
For example,
I met President Barack Obama last year.
The president will address the nation at
9:00 p.m.
The bill was sponsored by Representative
John Smith.
All representatives from Georgia will
attend the meeting.
*There
are mixed opinions about capitalization of the word “state” when it refers to a
party to litigation. I think the best
practice is to capitalize “State” in these situations. For example,
The State argues that sovereign immunity
applies to bar the claims.
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Here a Dash, There a Dash, Everywhere a Dash Dash
If you can’t
tell from my blog posts, I like dashes—and I use them frequently. Dashes are
great tools that can be used in several ways. Dashes
provide a stronger pause than commas and are good to use when you really want to
emphasize the material you would normally offset with commas. Consider the difference
between the two sentences below:
Even
Justice Scalia, one of the more conservative justices, joined the majority
opinion.
Even
Justice Scalia—one of the more conservative justices—joined the majority
opinion.
Dashes can be used to signal that the
writer is shifting tone or to contrast two ideas:
The
plaintiff diligently engaged in discovery and turned over all relevant materials—the defendant, on the other hand, delayed and stalled and still has
refused to produce the requested documents.
Dashes can also be used like semicolons to join
independent clauses:
The
defendant should not have been paroled—his psychiatrist testified that he would
be a threat to society if released from prison.
Note: When you
use a dash in a sentence, use an “em” dash (a dash the width of the letter “m”)
by hitting the dash key twice. A hyphen, on the other hand, should be made with
an “en” dash (a dash the width of the letter “n”) by hitting the dash key only
once. Check out the difference between the two in this sentence:
The
complaint meets the notice pleading requirements—it is a well-pleaded
complaint.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Unintended Consequences
This interesting article is about a new Florida law that serves as a good example of the perils of statutory drafting.
An internet café is challenging the recently enacted law, which banned internet cafés in an attempt to crack down on internet-based gambling establishments. The law prohibits “illegal slot machines.” An “illegal slot machine” includes any “system or network of devices that may be used in a game of chance.” The new law also creates a rebuttable presumption that a “device, system, or network is a prohibited slot machine or device if it is used to display images of games of chance and is part of a scheme involving any payment or donation of money or its equivalent or awarding anything of value.”
What's the problem, you ask? The new law appears to be so broad that the term “illegal slot machine” encompasses any computer, smart phone, or other electronic device that could be used to access an internet gambling site. This almost certainly isn't what the Florida legislature intended, but it looks like that it what it got.
The article provides a link to the complaint, if you're interested. You might notice that famed professor Alan Dershowitz is co-counsel for the café.
An internet café is challenging the recently enacted law, which banned internet cafés in an attempt to crack down on internet-based gambling establishments. The law prohibits “illegal slot machines.” An “illegal slot machine” includes any “system or network of devices that may be used in a game of chance.” The new law also creates a rebuttable presumption that a “device, system, or network is a prohibited slot machine or device if it is used to display images of games of chance and is part of a scheme involving any payment or donation of money or its equivalent or awarding anything of value.”
What's the problem, you ask? The new law appears to be so broad that the term “illegal slot machine” encompasses any computer, smart phone, or other electronic device that could be used to access an internet gambling site. This almost certainly isn't what the Florida legislature intended, but it looks like that it what it got.
The article provides a link to the complaint, if you're interested. You might notice that famed professor Alan Dershowitz is co-counsel for the café.
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Point Well Made
Ross
Guberman’s Point Made is an excellent
source for practitioners looking for easy ways to improve their writing. While Point
Made focuses on brief writing, Guberman’s 50 tips can be used in every type
of writing, from demand letters to appellate briefs.
Guberman also recommends interspersing “balanced, elegant” long sentences in legal writing to add literature-like richness. Again, Guberman’s examples are fabulous; again, this tip isn’t widely applicable. In fairness, Guberman himself admits the tip may be “too much” for some writers and suggests an alternative “freight-train” style that is more practical.
In the
book, Guberman offers pointers on organization, style, and sentence structure
including: using dashes, semi-colons, and colons to emphasize; interspersing short,
pithy sentences with longer ones to add interest (a tip I frequently employ);
conceding bad facts to spin them in a way that makes them less harmful; and
drafting parallel constructions to streamline information and comparisons. Many of Guberman’s fabulous pointers can be
employed by everyone from novice legal writers to seasoned brief drafters
My
favorite part of Point Made is
Guberman’s “real-life” examples, something lacking from many legal writing
books aimed at practitioners. It is easy
to give legal writing pointers; it’s harder to show legal writers how to use
those pointers to draft impactful briefs.
Guberman does an excellent job of outlining his tips then showing the
reader how the tips can be (and have been) used in real briefs. Guberman’s
examples are from public and private lawyers; from a variety of cases; from
plaintiffs and defendants, so there’s something for everyone in Point Made.
My only
criticism is that a few of Guberman’s tips aren’t widely usable or, in my
opinion, advisable. For example,
Guberman recommends that writers use rhetorical questions. I’ve never personally been involved in a case
where a party used a rhetorical question in a way that didn’t make the writer
seem arrogant. Admittedly, the examples
Guberman offers are very effective. But,
the rhetorical question tip is one, in my opinion, that should only be used by advanced
legal writers who can craft a rhetorical question that falls on the right side
of the line between clever and pretentious.
Guberman also recommends interspersing “balanced, elegant” long sentences in legal writing to add literature-like richness. Again, Guberman’s examples are fabulous; again, this tip isn’t widely applicable. In fairness, Guberman himself admits the tip may be “too much” for some writers and suggests an alternative “freight-train” style that is more practical.
Overall,
Guberman’s book is an excellent source for practitioners looking for “quick and
dirty” tips to improve their writing.
The book is easy to follow with a user-friendly format that will enable
any lawyer to pick it up and, thirty minutes later, implement Guberman’s tips.
I highly recommend Point Made.